Dear fellow scholars and lovely anonymous readers,
I'm sure you are all familiar with William Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet" and are most likely familiar with the musical adaptation "West Side Story" with Arthur Laurents, Leonard Bernstein, Stephen Sondheim and Jerome Robbins. Upon it's opening, "West Side Story" was an instant hit. People felt they could connect to the musical more than the play because they understand gangs and gunfights. Most audiences did not have first-hand knowledge of family feuds and sword-fights. The bests parts of "Romeo and Juliet" are included in "West Side Story". The musical has humor, love and death.
Yet, what is lost by turning sadness into salsa dance?
The Depth of Characters:
Although "West Side Story" has parallel characters to "Romeo and Juliet" (Tony is Romeo/ Maria is Juliet) the characters also have their differences. "West Side Story" can be seen in under two hours while reading "Romeo and Juliet" really well can take days. Since the musical has less time to present the characters, they also have less time to add depth to the characters. Tony is shown as a young man in love, yes, however, his songs do not hold the poetry that Romeo's lines do because A.) They are quite repetitive (Maria!Maria!) and B.) Let's be honest, no one can write quite like Shakespeare. Also "Romeo and Juliet" does have characters used for comic relief but not to the extent that "West Side Story" does. I can think of three "West Side Story" songs off the top of my head that have no other purpose than to make the audience laugh. I really think this draws away from the sense of tragedy in the end. There was too much laughter to distract from the sadness at the end.
The Death of Characters:
I think the main difference between the deaths in "Romeo and Juliet" and the deaths in "West Side Story" is that in "West Side Story" the Juliet character (Maria) doesn't die. What's up with that? Tragedy, according to the lovely long packets that Ms. Pyle assigned us, is when characters are taken from a high place to a low place. In "Romeo and Juliet", Romeo and Juliet are taken from being happily in love to...dead. Great ending. Yet in "West Side Story", Maria doesn't die. She has a life ahead of her. She has a chance for hope, for love, for children. Therefore, I declare that "West Side Story" is not a perfect tragedy because it doesn't have a perfect tragic ending.
The ending also tries to say too much about gang-life. The whole musical is a social commentary on immigrants, gangs, and how in the end all our young people will destroy each other. Basically. This distracts from the tragedy of it all. It makes people think beyond the characters and into the real world.
What is gained?
Lets be honest. Our generation has the attention span of an ant and can sit through a musical full of lights, dancing and gunshots more easily that one of Shakespeare's plays (No matter how eloquent the prose may be. It does work as a good social commentary although I think that distracts from the tragic aspect of the musical. Also the dancing is great. Super great.