Monday, January 27, 2014

Understanding the draw of horror movies (horror blog post)

Ever since I was a kid, I've hated anything to do with horror. I'd purposefully fall asleep whenever my friends were watching Texas Chainsaw Massacre or Jaws or whatever at a sleepover and until I was about 15 I refused to read anything more frightening than Harry Potter. Last year when we read "In Cold Blood" in AP Lang I had to space out the horror so that I'd have a week or so to recover between chapters. So I've been stuck with the question why it is that I detest horror and so many other people like it. I did some internet research and found a few answers from Dr. Glenn Sparks from Purdue University.
Sparks argues that people enjoy or dislike horror movies because they are wired differently. Some people enjoy adrenaline rushes (also the people who like roller coasters) and some people do not. For example I was driving in white-out conditions this morning and sliding all over the place and I was scared to death. I did not enjoy driving. However, my sister and a few of my friends would have gotten a kick out of living on the edge and seeing just how much my poor little Prius could take.
Me this morning:





People who like horror movies:


Sparks argued that the other group of people who enjoy horror movies are the people who crave danger and adventure in their lives. These people are able to live out escapes and machete-fights without ever having to leave their homes and also without ever facing real danger.

So basically there the world is classified into types of people and finding out whether someone likes horror movies can tell a lot about the person. Besides telling whether or not they secretly crave danger or are an adrenaline junkie, willingness to watch horror movies and to put oneself in scary situations can show whether or not someone is able to meet their fears. Or that their fears may not be found in horror movies. Horror movies often play off the universal fear of death and those who go out of their way to watch horror movies may be more okay with death than the rest of us, have twisted suppressed minds or perhaps they just like to be scared. I've researched a lot and I still can't fully understand why people choose to spend time being scared and watching people get chopped up into bits. I guess everyone's different and that makes life interesting. Until it gets a little too interesting...
 
Yeah, a raccoon is about as scary as I can take.                                                                                                                                                     

Monday, January 13, 2014

Incest in Hamlet! What fun!

For this weeks assignment we were told to write about something to do with Hamlet that we have not fully covered in class. I thought talking about incest would be fun! Most of these ideas I claim wholly as my own so they might not actually be correct. Actually, who am I kidding? Shakespeare was a twisted guy...I'm totally right.

1.) Claudius and Gertrude:

The relationship between Hamlet's uncle and mother is the most obvious example of incest in the play. Only two months after Hamlet's father died, they got married. This made Hamlet quite angry and uncomfortable. He can be quoted in his angsty soliloquy as saying that "She married. (Gertrude) O, most wicked speed, to post With such dexterity to incestuous sheets!" (Act 1) Marriage between in-laws was looked down on at that time by the Christian church because it was considered incest. The fact that it was so speedy after the late King Hamlet's death did not help.

2.) Polonius and Ophelia:

Before you go all crazy on me for this one, hear me out. I am not claiming that Polonius and Ophelia had a sexual relationship but I am claiming that their relationship went a bit further than the average father and daughter relationship. Hamlet refers to Polonius as a "fishmonger" throughout the play, implying that Polonius acts as his daughter's pimp to gain power. It is true that Polonius does consistently push the theory that Hamlet was driven mad by his love for Ophelia. His control over his daughter and her love life can also be seen when he warns her to stay away from Hamlet because he will not be a committed beau. Ophelia always listens to him. She is completely dependent and seems to make no real decisions of her own.  When Polonius is killed, Ophelia is driven mad with grief. She sings songs about dead lovers and flowers. It is true that some think the lover in the songs is Hamlet, yet one of the songs describes the dead lover as having a white beard. They were not sexually involved but I do think that Ophelia had very complex feelings for her father and the line between father and love-interest is shown as being very blurred when she descends into madness.

3.) Hamlet and Gertrude

So I'm absolutely positive that there is nothing physical going on between these two but I do think that Hamlet talks WAY too much about his mother's sex life. I think he has a bit of an Oedipus Rex complex. Of course he couldn't really do the killing the father part of the complex since his Uncle did that for him...Perhaps there's a bit of jealousy in Hamlet's despise for Claudius. Perhaps his need to avenge his father comes from his guilt that he has some serious mommy issues.



Monday, December 2, 2013

What is lost by turning sadness into salsa dance? (Tragedy)

Dear fellow scholars and lovely anonymous readers,
I'm sure you are all familiar with William Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet" and are most likely familiar with the musical adaptation "West Side Story" with Arthur Laurents, Leonard Bernstein, Stephen Sondheim and Jerome Robbins. Upon it's opening, "West Side Story" was an instant hit. People felt they could connect to the musical more than the play because they understand gangs and gunfights. Most audiences did not have first-hand knowledge of family feuds and sword-fights. The bests parts of "Romeo and Juliet" are included in "West Side Story". The musical has humor, love and death.  

Yet, what is lost by turning sadness into salsa dance?


 The Depth of Characters:

Although "West Side Story" has parallel characters to "Romeo and Juliet" (Tony is Romeo/ Maria is Juliet) the characters also have their differences. "West Side Story" can be seen in under two hours while reading "Romeo and Juliet" really well can take days. Since the musical has less time to present the characters, they also have less time to add depth to the characters. Tony is shown as a young man in love, yes, however, his songs do not hold the poetry that Romeo's lines do because A.) They are quite repetitive (Maria!Maria!) and B.) Let's be honest, no one can write quite like Shakespeare. Also "Romeo and Juliet" does have characters used for comic relief but not to the extent that "West Side Story" does. I can think of three "West Side Story" songs off the top of my head that have no other purpose than to make the audience laugh. I really think this draws away from the sense of tragedy in the end. There was too much laughter to distract from the sadness at the end.

The Death of Characters:
 I think the main difference between the deaths in "Romeo and Juliet" and the deaths in "West Side Story" is that in "West Side Story" the Juliet character (Maria) doesn't die. What's up with that? Tragedy, according to the lovely long packets that Ms. Pyle assigned us, is when characters are taken from a high place to a low place. In "Romeo and Juliet", Romeo and Juliet are taken from being happily in love to...dead. Great ending. Yet in "West Side Story", Maria doesn't die. She has a life ahead of her. She has a chance for hope, for love, for children. Therefore, I declare that "West Side Story" is not a perfect tragedy because it doesn't have a perfect tragic ending. 
The ending also tries to say too much about gang-life. The whole musical is a social commentary on immigrants, gangs, and how in the end all our young people will destroy each other. Basically. This distracts from the tragedy of it all. It makes people think beyond the characters and into the real world. 

What is gained?
Lets be honest. Our generation has the attention span of an ant and can sit through a musical full of lights, dancing and gunshots more easily that one of Shakespeare's plays (No matter how eloquent the prose may be. It does work as a good social commentary although I think that distracts from the tragic aspect of the musical. Also the dancing is great. Super great.
 










Saturday, November 16, 2013

A closer look at Victorian tea time (CC)

In AP Literature and Composition, my class just read "The Importance of Being Earnest" by Oscar Wilde. "The Importance of Being Earnest" presents a lot of social criticisms on the Victorian Era and satirizes just about everything one could think of to satirize. A lot of the acts in this play occur during "tea-time". This idea of tea-time was used in the Victorian era by those in the upper class for two main reasons. 1.) It broke up the long break without food between breakfast in dinner, as at that time, lunch was non-existent. 2.) It provided an excuse for socialization. It was perfectly acceptable and polite to invite friends or even people of the opposite gender (*gasp) over for tea. Since all the characters in "The Importance of Being Earnest" were part of the upper class their tea consisted of muffins, cake and pastries. "Tea-time" for the lower classes would more likely have meat, cheese and whatever they could come up with for a small mid-afternoon meal.

Tea-time for the upper class:


Tea-time for the poor:
 
Tea-time is still very much apparent in the lives of Europeans today. Aprilynne Pike captures this love of tea in her book, Illusions, by saying“As far as her mom was concerned, tea fixed everything. Have a cold? Have some tea. Broken bones? There's a tea for that too. Somewhere in her mother's pantry, Laurel suspected, was a box of tea that said, 'In case of Armageddon, steep three to five minutes'.”
 The Queen of England often has over important people to tea to socialize. It's used as an excuse to wear large garden hats and gossip. There are also a lot of rules of how to drink, eat and talk while attending a tea with someone. In "The Importance of Being Earnest" Oscar Wilde highlights these rules by having his characters continually break them. Algernon eats all the finger sandwiches before his guests arrive and Cecily serves Gwendolyn things she doesn't want to show her anger. In "How to read literature like a Professor" the author remarked upon how sharing a meal with someone (or a Tea) can create a feeling of intimacy or friendship. However when things go badly in a meal (or tea) it symbolizes conflict and hidden animosity.
 
Fun myths about the discovery of tea:
Some say that in 2737 BC the Emperor of China, Shennong, was drinking some boiled water when a few leaves from a nearby tree flew into it. He decided he liked the taste and popularized it.
Another more gruesome tale says that Bodhidharma, the founder of Chan Buddhism, accidentally fell asleep for eight years. When he woke up he cut off his eyelids out of anger with himself and the eyelids fell to the ground and turned into tea-bushes.
I'm not making this up. I kind of wish I was.
 
On a different note, I'm going to include some recipes of things upper-class people would eat during Tea-time in the Victorian age:
Simple Petit Fours
Simple Petit Fours
Recipe Type: Cake, Afternoon Tea and High Tea, Dessert
Yields: 20 to 24 petit fours
Prep time: 30 min

Ingredients:

1 (16-ounce) frozen Sara Lee® Pound Cake*
1 jar raspberry jam
2 cans Vanilla Frosting
Cake frosting paste (your choice)
Wilton Pearlized Pink Sugar Pearls (see photo on right)
* Available in the frozen section of your local grocery store.

Preparation:
Using a sharp knife, slice the pound cake horizontally into three (3) layers.
Spread raspberry jam over the top of two (2) layers only; placing one layer on top of the other layer. Then place the 3rd layer on top and cut the cake into approximately 1-inch squares; set aside.
Heat one (1) can of vanilla frosting in the microwave for 15 to 20 seconds (it should look like the consistency of heavy cream); remove from microwave and stir. Stir in small amount of food coloring paste, of your choice, to make a pastel color. NOTE: I use a toothpick to pick up a small amount of paste and add it to the frosting. Use a fresh toothpick each time you need more paste because you don't want frosting in your paste. The liquid-type food coloring will dilute your frosting and that's why I use the paste. Repeat with the second can of frosting, using a different food coloring paste of your choice. NOTE: You may need to reheat your frosting to keep it at spreading consistency as the fat content of the frosting causes it to thicken fast.
Over a cookie sheet or the bowl, hold each petit four on top of a large fork and drizzle the warm frosting over it to completely cover. Place on a drying rack and top with three (3) small Pink Sugar Balls or decor of your choice. Set aside to let dry and the frosting to harden.
Place in pretty cupcake cups and store in refrigerator until ready to serve.
Makes approximately 20 to 24 petit fours.
.
tray of tea sandwiches
Cucumber Tea Sandwich (Please get the book reference ;))
Recipe Type: Sandwich, Afternoon Tea & High Tea, Cucumbers
Yields: 8 whole sandwiches
Prep time: 10 min

Ingredients:
 

1/2 seedless cucumber, peeled and very thinly sliced (about 32 slices)
1/2 cup unsalted butter, room temperature
1/2 cup coarsely-chopped watercress leaves
16 slices best-quality white bread*
Salt to taste
1/2 cup alfalfa sprouts
* Choose the best-quality white or wheat bread as possible. Never serve end slices. Freezing the bread before cutting and then spreading makes for easier handling.

Preparation:
Place cucumber slices between layers of paper towels to remove excess moisture.
In a small bowl, combine butter and watercress; spread on one side of each slice of bread.
Lay cucumber slices onto the buttered side of eight (8) slices of bread. Sprinkle the cucumbers with salt. Cover each with 1 tablespoon alfalfa sprouts and top with the remaining slices of bread, buttered side down.
Carefully cut the crusts from each sandwich with a long, sharp knife after the sandwiches are filled. Cut the sandwiches in half diagonally and then cut in half again. If desired, decorative shapes can be made with cookie cutters.
Yields 8 whole sandwiches or 16 halves or 32 fourths.
 

 
 

Wednesday, November 6, 2013

Why I personally dislike the art movement of Mannerism (FW)

What is Mannerism?
Mannerism was a 60 year art historical period that started around the end of the Italian High Renaissance (1520) and continued until the start of the Baroque Period (1580). It is characterized by distorted body proportions (freakishly long necks and long legs), irrational settings, precarious poses and tension. 

Now, why do I hate it so much?
  That is a much more difficult question. Whether or not art is good is completely subjective. The things that bothered me most about Mannerism might appeal to another person's tastes. I can't say that Mannerism is bad or good because that is a opinion. However, I can state why I personally found it so completely disturbing.

Why I found Mannerism disturbing:
1.) Body Proportions
This painting by Parmigiano is correctly named "Madonna with the Long Neck" (1534)
Check out how huge that baby is. No baby should be THAT BIG. No neck should be THAT long. We can assume that Parmigiano mean the body proportions to be unrealistic, but why? I can't really understand his reasoning except that there are a lot of normal-necked "Madonna with child" paintings and mannerist artists liked to be original.
2.) I'm claustrophobic...
and the colors...
   This painting is "Entombment" by Pontormo (1528). The body proportions are not excessively stretched in this artwork which is a plus, however I am bothered by the color scheme and the act that Pontormo crammed ten people into a painting that should have held three. All the people are so distracting that I feel I can't focus on what the painting means. It takes me a few seconds to find Jesus each time I look at this painting because everything else is SO DISTRACTING. Also Pontormo chooses to uses pastels in his interpretation of the entombment of Christ which I feel is a bit too cheery for the situation.

 3.) Uncomfortable subject matter
 Angelo Bronzino 001.jpg (1545)  "Venus, Cupid, Folly and Time" by Bronzino
Since the Renaissance was such a period of artistic growth and exploration, those in the Mannerist movement realized that they had little to explore other than new subject matter. This is how we arrive at a disturbing portrayal of a grown Cupid in an affair with his mother, Venus. I really like they symbolism of other parts of the portrait such as Folly carrying flowers and jealousy looking on with anguish but the whole mother-son relationship is too disturbing to look past. 
4.)Art for the Artist's sake
 "The Rape of the Sabine Woman" -Giambologna
I love this sculpture. The emotion is shown so clearly in the body position and it really shows off incredible artistic technique. This sculpture is so good that when I first saw it I felt that it might have that ability to redeem the Mannerist period. Then I researched it... Giambologna created this piece for no other reason that to show off his own artistic ability. I felt duped. I had felt like this sculpture makes so many statements, and I was truly dissapointed when I realized it wasn't meant to make any. The structure of this is still really impressive though. I'll admit that.

Reasons why Mannerism is okay
Mannerism really worked to push everyone outside of their comfort zones. Artists took on risky material and tried out new methods of creating a scene which were unheard of in the Renaissance. It's awesome that society allowed them this much artistic freedom and expression. I just didn't really like the products. However, I can appreciate the fact that Mannerism elicited such strong emotions from me. I'm sure the artists realized at the time that what they were creating would outrage a lot of people. I respect that they went on to create the art anyways. 

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

What would happen if our society followed the Old Testament? (IR)

For my Independent Reading, I read "A Handmaid's Tale."
It was incredibly disturbing.
The premise of the book was that the United States of America had been divided into different warring religious sects and the one that held the most power, the Republic of Gilead, was a branch of Christianity that took the Old Testament and New Testament at it's word. Many don't interpret the bible literally nowadays because many aspects of it are a bit out of date. The main outdated aspect that is exemplified in "A Handmaid's Tale" is the Bible's views toward women. Since I have read only catches of the Bible I decided that I needed to do some biblical research after reading the book just to make sure that everything the futuristic society made into law regarding woman was actually from the bible. Scarily enough, it was. Here is what I found from my research.
Biblical Quotes and how they connect to "A Handmaid's Tale":
 1.) To the woman he said, "I will greatly multiply your pain in childbirth. In pain you will bring forth children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you."-Genesis
 In the Republic of Gilead, women are allowed no anesthetics in childbirth so that they can fully feel the pain of birth. They are also most certainly "ruled over" by their husbands.
2.)“When Rachel saw that she bore Jacob no children, she envied her sister; and she said to Jacob, Give me children or I shall die! Then she said, Here is my maid Bilhah; go in to her, that she may bear upon my knees, and even I may have children through her.’”
This is where the Republic of Gilead got the inspiration for handmaids. Handmaids are basically mistresses sent out by the government to create children for families when the wife cannot conceive.  They take the scripture so seriously that in order to "follow scripture" the handmaids from Gilead must actually conceive the baby while resting on the wife's knees. No kidding.
3.)“I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent.” (1 Timothy 2:12)
In the Republic of Gilead, women are not allowed to learn, or to read. Even the Bible must be read by a man.

I don't know what else to say about this book other than it made me seriously frightened of all religion. It also made me think of "Imagine" by Paul McCartney. Do you think we'd be better off with no religion? I'm not sure. Religion can do a great deal of good, but when misinterpreted  or given too much power it can do a great deal of evil. 

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Invictus

Invictus
by W.E. Henley
Out of the night that covers me,
Black as the Pit from pole to pole,
I thank whatever gods may be
For my unconquerable soul.

In the fell clutch of circumstance
I have not winced nor cried aloud.
Under the bludgeonings of chance
My head is bloody, but unbowed.

Beyond this place of wrath and tears
Looms but the horror of the shade,
And yet the menace of the years
Finds, and shall find me, unafraid.

It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishments the scroll,
I am the master of my fate;
I am the captain of my soul.


If "Invictus" is not one of the most popular poems of all time, it is at least among the most well-known. Many scholars trash "Invictus" because it is very unspecific and does not clearly state what circumstance the poem is about. Frankly, this is the very reason that I love it. "Invictus" is like abstract art. The basic picture can be clearly seen, but what people make of the picture can vary drastically.


Most people recognize the theme of holding strong against adversity in "Invictus". The author, Henley struggled with arthritis throughout his life, and many believed that the poem was about his winning struggle against the affliction. Many interpret it to have a much deeper meaning and connection to their own lives. The poem was a central part of the movie "Invictus" which focused on South Africa's apartheid movement and Nelson Mandela's strength when he was imprisoned. Because the poem is non-specific to what the specific adversity the author is facing, the poem can be used in new revolutionary ways.
Also after doing some research on this poem, I became interested in the Christian message behind the poem. "how strait the gate" and "charged with punishment the scroll" are direct references to biblical scripture. One could see this reference to mean that the author is holding strong against death or fear of death. Or, perhaps more morbidly, it may mean that the author is giving into death. They are "the captain of their soul" and therefore cannot be spiritually harmed by physical torment ("bloody but unbowed") that happens on earth. There are so many ways to look at this poem. Whichever way one looks at it, it is a poem of great strength and passion. Memorize it and recite it in your head when you are facing hardship or find yourself not being able to stand up for yourself. It helps.

Invictus translates to "Unconquerable"